IFRS 15 vs. IAS 18: Huge Change Is Here!
When to recognize revenue? This simple question is one of the most controversial issues in today’s accounting.
Why?
Well, it’s simple and easy when you sell goods, but how about long-term contracts or some sort of services?
You need to have some rules on WHEN to recognize the revenue from all these things, because all your profits and losses, your reputation in front of the outside world and your taxes depend on this.
Revenue recognition rules have just changed and later in this article, you’ll find an example showing you the impact of this change.
Revenue Recognition: IFRS vs. US GAAP
Until now, revenue recognition was exactly one of the biggest gaps between IFRS and US GAAP.
As you know, IAS 18 Revenue contains principles for revenue recognition, but they are quite broad and as a result, many companies use their judgment to apply them in their specific situation. Some companies even developed their own IFRS policies based on the US GAAP rules.
Opposed to IFRS, US GAAP guidance about revenues is very detailed – US GAAP contains about 100 separate documents and protocols about revenue recognition in specific areas (often conflicting, by the way).
Finally, these 2 standards came closer and tried to solve all these differences on 28 May 2014.
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
New revenue recognition standard was issued: IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and it should fill the gap between IFRS and US GAAP.
FASB (the US GAAP standard setting body) issued the new revenue recognition standard, too: Topic 606, which is almost a mirror of IFRS 15 (full text of Topic 606 is here).
Although I’ll cover this standard in one of my videos in the following months, here are the basic points for your information:
-
- You’ll need to apply IFRS 15 for reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018 (early application permitted);
- IFRS 15 will replace the following standards and interpretations:
- IAS 18 Revenue,
- IAS 11 Construction Contracts
- SIC 31 Revenue – Barter Transaction Involving Advertising Services
- IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty Programs
- IFRIC 15 Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate and
- IFRIC 18 Transfer of Assets from Customers
- The core principle of IFRS 15 is that an entity will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration (payment) to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
To apply this principle, you need to follow a five-step model framework described below.
- IFRS 15 contains guidance for transactions not previously addressed (service revenue, contract modifications);
- IFRS 15 improves guidance for multiple-element arrangements;
- IFRS 15 requires enhanced disclosures about revenue.
Five-Step Model Framework
Every company must follow the five-step model in order to comply with IFRS 15. We’ll not go into details, just let me brief you a bit:
- Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer.
IFRS 15 defines a contract as an agreement between two or more parties that creates enforceable rights and obligations and sets out the criteria for every contract that must be met.
- Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract.
A performance obligation is a promise in a contract with a customer to transfer a good or service to the customer.
- Step 3: Determine the transaction price.
The transaction price is the amount of consideration (for example, payment) to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer, excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties.
- Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract. For a contract that has more than one performance obligation, an entity should allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation in an amount that depicts the amount of consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for satisfying each performance obligation.
- Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
Who Will Feel the Biggest Impact of IFRS 15?
The experts say that the most impacted industries are telecom, software development, real estate and other industries with long-term contracts.
If you work in an industry where bundled contracts of “product + service” are quite common, then you should pay attention.
I’m referring mainly to software development or telecommunications, where customers usually buy a prepayment plans with a handset or software development comes with implementation and post-delivery service in 1 package, or any similar arrangements.
Under the new model, companies in telecom and software will probably recognize revenue earlier than under older rules.
Why is that?
Well, because under new IFRS 15, the transaction price must be allocated to the individual performance obligations in the contract and recognized when these obligations are delivered or fulfilled.
It means that under new IFRS 15, telecom operator must allocate a part of the revenue from prepayment plan with free handset to the sale of handset, too.
Under IAS 18, the revenue is defined as a gross inflow of economic benefits arising from ordinary operating activities of an entity.
It means that if the operator gives a handset for free with the prepayment plan, then the revenue from handset is 0.
OK, if that sounds a bit confusing, we’ll better look at numbers.
Example: IAS 18 vs. IFRS 15
Johnny enters into a 12-month telecom plan with the local mobile operator ABC. The terms of plan are as follows:
- Johnny’s monthly fixed fee is CU 100.
- Johnny receives a free handset at the inception of the plan.
ABC sells the same handsets for CU 300 and the same monthly prepayment plans without handset for CU 80/month.
How should ABC recognize the revenues from this plan in line with IAS 18 and IFRS 15?
OK, let’s ignore a couple of things here, like a price of a SIM kit, or the situations when Johnny hangs on the phone for hours and spends some minutes in excess of his plan. Let’s focus just on these 2 things.
Revenue under IAS 18
Current rules of IAS 18 say that ABC should apply the recognition criteria to the separately identifiable components of a single transaction (here: handset + monthly plan).
However, IAS 18 does not give any guidance on how to identify these components and how to allocate selling price and as a result, there were different practices applied.
For example, telecom companies recognized revenue from the sale of monthly plans in full as the service was provided, and no revenue for handset – they treated the cost of handset as the cost of acquiring the customer.
Some companies identified these components, but then limited the revenue allocated to the sale of handset to the amount received from customer (zero in this case). This is a certain form of a residual method (based on US GAAP’s cash cap method).
For the simplicity, let’s assume that ABC recognizes no revenue from the sale of handset, because ABC gives it away for free. The cost of handset is recognized to profit or loss and effectively, ABC treats that as a cost of acquiring new customer.
Revenue from monthly plan is recognized on a monthly basis. The journal entry is to debit receivables or cash and credit revenues with CU 100.
Revenue under IFRS 15
Under new rules in IFRS 15, ABC needs to identify the contract first (step 1), which is obvious here as there’s a clear 12-month plan with Johnny.
Then, ABC needs to identify all performance obligations from the contract with Johnny (step 2 in a 5-step model):
-
-
- Obligation to deliver a handset
- Obligation to deliver network services over 1 year
-
The transaction price (step 3) is CU 1 200, calculated as monthly fee of CU 100 times 12 months.
Now, ABC needs to allocate that transaction price of CU 1 200 to individual performance obligations under the contract based on their relative stand-alone selling prices (or their estimates) – this is step 4.
I made it really simple for you here, so let’s do it in the following table:
Performance obligation | Stand-alone selling price |
% on total | Revenue (=relative selling price = 1 200*%) |
Handset | 300.00 | 23.8% | 285.60 |
Network services | 960.00 (=80*12) | 76.2% | 914.40 |
Total | 1 260.00 | 100.0% | 1 200.00 |
The step 5 is to recognize the revenue when ABC satisfies the performance obligations. Therefore:
-
-
- When ABC gives a handset to Johnny, it needs to recognize the revenue of CU 285.60;
- When ABC provides network services to Johnny, it needs to recognize the total revenue of CU 914.40. It’s practical to do it once per month as the billing happens.
-
The journal entries are summarized in the following table:
Description | Amount | Debit | Credit | When |
285.60 | FP – Unbilled revenue | P/L – Revenue from sale of goods | When handset is given to Johnny | |
Network services | 100.00 (= monthly billing to Johnny) | FP – Receivable to Johnny | When network services are provided; on a monthly basis according to contract with Johnny | |
76.20 (=914.40/12) | P/L – Revenue from network services | |||
23.80 (=285.60/12) | FP – Unbilled revenue |
So as you can see, Johnny effectively pays not only for network services, but also for his handset.
What’s the Impact of the IFRS 15?
The biggest impact of the new standard is that the companies will report profits in a different way and profit reporting patterns will change.
In our telecom example, ABC reported loss in the beginning of the contract and then steady profits under IAS 18, because they recognized the revenue in line with the invoicing to customers.
Under IFRS 15, ABC’s reported profits are the same in total, but their pattern over time is different.
Why does it matter?
Well, because some contracts surpass one accounting period. They are long-term and reporting revenues in incorrect accounting periods might cause wrong taxation, different reporting to stock exchange and other things, too.
Don’t believe me?
Just look at ABC. Let’s say that contract started on 1 July 20X1 and ABC’s financial year-end is 31 December 20X1. Just look how much profits ABC reports from the same contract with Johnny under IAS 18 and IFRS 15 in the year 20X1:
Performance obligation | Under IAS 18 | Under IFRS 15 |
Handset | 0.00 | 285.60 |
Network services | 600.00 (=100*6) | 457.20 (=76.2*6) |
Total | 600.00 | 742.80 |
How to Prepare for IFRS 15
I really do think that IFRS 15 is a huge change and it requires a massive amount of work not only from accountants, but also from IT departments, tax people and maybe other departments in your company, too.
A few ideas for your future steps:
- Go through your contracts and evaluate
Your profit reporting will depend on the specific contract terms. If your company has a number of different types of contracts, you need to assess each type separately and decide how to deal with that type in line with IFRS 15.
- Change your accounting system
OK, how many customers does the “average” telecom company have?How many contracts are there?
Thousands. Millions. Tens of millions.
And once you decide how to recognize revenue for each type of contract that you have, then you need to implement this accounting process into your accounting software or system.
Whether you realize it or not, the implementation of IFRS 15 will cost affected companies significant amount of money for system upgrades, consultants, training the employees and other related activities.
That’s why IFRS 15 must be implemented starting 1 January 2018 – some time is left for making these changes.
- Go back and restate existing contracts
I did not want to scare you in my previous point, but this is going to be a bit scary:All companies need to look back and recalculate profits and revenue reporting from all contracts.
When you apply IFRS 15, you need to apply it as the new rules have always been in place, that is retrospectively.
Let’s say that Johnny and ABC enter into 2-year plan on 1 July 2015 and IFRS 15 has not applied yet; thus ABC recognized zero revenue for handset and monthly revenues from network services in line with the billing.
On 1 January 2017, ABC will apply IFRS 15 and contract with Johnny is still open (it expires on 30 June 2017). ABC needs to perform all the calculations as shown above and adjust opening balances related to the contract.
What does it mean?
Companies will need to gather lots of numbers, fair values, estimates, stand-alone selling prices and other things and then perform lots of recalculations and adjustments.
Just imagine you work in a construction of real estate and you’re affected by IFRS 15. Some contracts run for 10 or 15 years … OK, I finish here and leave it to your imagination.
UPDATE 2018: I have written few articles about IFRS 15 and you can check them out here:
- IFRS 15 Examples: How IFRS 15 affects your company
- Accounting for discounts under IFRS
- How to account for customer incentives under IFRS
- Principal or agent – revenue or liability?
- Short summary of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (with video)
Now, I’d really love to hear your view. Do you think IFRS 15 will hit you hard? Are you making your plans to adopt or implement it? Please leave a comment below and if you liked reading this article, share it with your friends here.
JOIN OUR FREE NEWSLETTER AND GET
report "Top 7 IFRS Mistakes" + free IFRS mini-course
Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.
Recent Comments
- Silvia on 3 Biggest Myths in Accounting for PPE
- RASHEED ABOLOMOPE on 3 Biggest Myths in Accounting for PPE
- Silvia on IFRS Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economy (IAS 29)
- Navison on IFRS Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economy (IAS 29)
- Silvia on IAS 12 Income Taxes
Categories
- Accounting Policies and Estimates (14)
- Consolidation and Groups (24)
- Current Assets (21)
- Financial Instruments (56)
- Financial Statements (52)
- Foreign Currency (9)
- IFRS Videos (71)
- Insurance (3)
- Most popular (6)
- Non-current Assets (54)
- Other Topics (15)
- Provisions and Other Liabilities (45)
- Revenue Recognition (26)
- Uncategorized (1)
Hi Silvia,
Please clear below doubt:
As per IAS 18 para 9 “Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable”.
Also recognition criteria to the separately identifiable components of a single transaction (here: handset + monthly plan).
SO it means Fair value has to be calculated for each identifiable component separately.
My query is, How IAS 18 is different from IFRS 15 here. As both recognize revenue based upon Fair value and separately identifiable component basis.
Thanks in advance.
Dear Abishek,
please read the article above, paragraph Revenue under IAS 18, below Example. I explained that yes, there was a vague statement of separability, but the guidance was missing and companies interpreted it in their own way. Please read more above. Thank you. S.
Hi Silvia,
I’m writing a thesis on the IFRS 15. I found your example really usefull and easy. Did you write other articles about the differences between ifrs and the other IAS 11, IFRIC 13,15, 18 etc, which will be replaced?
Thanks,
Margaux, no, not yet. Everything I wrote is available on this web. S.
Someone published your article on Linkedin:https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ifrs-15-vs-ias-18-huge-change-here-tarek-kamar
Thank you very much for this info. See, lots of people simply steal the content. I will file a DMCA action against it. Thank once again! S.
Hi Silvia, please, could you help me? I have to write essay about IFRS 15 in telecommunications company and I don´t understand it. The unit offers program for 20 EUR per month. Customers can also buy cell phone for 2 EUR with this program. Stand-alone price of cell phone is 170 EUR. If customer doesn’t buy cell phone, how many revenues company can recognizes? Is possibility to buy cell phone a new performance obligation? Must company allocate transaction price to cell phone? Thank you for your help. Have a nice day 🙂
Hi Silvia! thank you for your effort in explaining matters about IFRS15. I would want to ask you about how does the implementation of IFRS15 would affect retail players?What specific aspect/s would be affected by it and how? Actually I’m doing a research now with regards to this matter. I hope you can answer me precisely. Thank You!
Charmaine,
this is very broad question to answer precisely in one comment – it would require a whole essay. Just think of many activities retailers do and analyze. For example – how buy 1+get 1 free will be accounted? Loyalty schemes? Listing fees? Etc. S.
Hi Silvia, thanks for your response. As for what I asked from you, could you explain what corollaries would a retail player undergo under IFRS 15 considering their accounting for contract costs, gift cards, customer loyalty programs, warranty and sales returns? Thank you so much!!!
and how would the application of IFRS 15 affect the profit reporting of these retail players?
Hi, why did u say the IAS 18 revenue principles are broad? Could you give example of why is it broad? Thanks
Hi Silva,
Your notes are very clear and understandable, I like it thanks,
Thank Silvia for the interesting explanation.
Although this is mainly focused on Telecom and wherever I read about IFRS 15, it focuses mainly on Telecom.
I have a question here:
– what happens to percentage of completion method in long term construction contracts? – thanks.
Mohammad,
IFRS 15 also introduces a sort of percentage of completion method, when you assess that you’ll recognize revenue over time in some long-term contracts. So maybe it will remain untouched in your particular case, but it needs to be carefully assessed. S.
May i know the measurement theory behind the standard IFRS 15 is what ??
Hi Silvia
Thanks for this great helpful article
I would like to know your view on application of IFRS 15 to Shipbuilding industry. I’m working in shipbuilding industry and all our contracts are long-term (more than 2 years). Final product is delivered to customer after construction is completed. I am a bit confused if i should wait for the delivery point for revenue recognition? If that is so, all periods until delivery period will boil up with huge amount of loss
Hi Silvia
How the change order will going to treat in any case ? Can you explain something with change orders .( Anything apart from Telecom Industry ).
Thank you.
I need to know why there was a shift from IAS 18 to IFRS 15
thanks for the explanation.
Hi,
We have the following transactions:
“Sale Rebate Promotion expense” transaction wherein our customer is given rebate if they achieved monthly and quarterly target.
“0% Subsidy Promotion Expense” is an exepense that we subsidize for bank charges for 0 interest installment.
My question is “Is this deductible from Revenue” under IFRS 15?
Hope someone can help me.
Thanks,
Dennis
Hi Dennis,
these items need to be taken into account when you estimate the total transaction price (step 3 in the 5-step model). So if you estimate some sale rebate promotion to your customer in the future, you should reasonably reflect it in the total transaction price in order to recognize revenue in line with the 5 step model. S.
Hi Silvia,
Thank you for your prompt reply. For sales rebate, I understand that this is just like a voume discount. The difference is our sales rebate is based on amount instead of volume. For 0% subsidy, can you explain futher why this should be deducted against revenue? Currently, we present this as promotion expense.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Hi Dennis, could you explain in a detail what 0% subsidy exactly is? I’m a bit confused or I miss something in your above information. I thought it’s a sort of compensation provided to a client, but maybe I’m wrong, so please clarify. S.
If our dealer offer a 0% interest to their customer..this mean that our dealer shoulders the credit card charges… portion of this credit charges will subsidize by our company…
Thanks Silvia M for your useful paper. I am studying Paper P2 ”Corporating reporting” in the ACCA program. Its a challenging paper, i need to gain a sound knowledge on IAS to pass the exam. So pls share your helpful papers like that. Thank you so much!
Really its a very useful article which simplifies many complex issues…thanks:)
Hi Silvia,
I have been tracking the trails of various queries and your clarifications. It’s simply great. I have one doubt though. Could you please clarify as to how the adoption of a newly introduced standard can be treated as ‘a change in accounting policy’ and require retrospective application?
Hi Milind,
I guess you have used some accounting policy for certain items before the adoption of the new standard. When the new standard is adopted, then you are forced to change your previous accounting – so that is a change in accounting policy. Moreover – it is clearly written in IAS 8.
With regard to retrospective application – the new standard usually contains a guidance for adopting it. Some standards require full retrospective application, but some of them permit you some exceptions. For example, also IFRS 15 contains 2 options for application – full retrospective approach or modified approach (which is less strict). Hope it helps S.
Hi S
Thanks for the clarification. Probably I had not paid enough attention to the para C3 of the transition provision in the text of the standard. It’s clear now. My take is the modified approach will suit most of the adopters.
Hi Silvia,
Thanks for this illustration it was so helpful.
I have a question, in the contract inception we made an assumption of the expected monthly commitment (914.40/12=76.2 per Month), based on this assumption we booked the handset revenue (285.60).
What if the actual monthly invoice for this customer was with different amount than (76.2) which we made our assumptions upon.(True-Up)
Shall we recalculate or adjust the percentage of allocation each month based on the actual invoice or to recognize all the difference as a service revenue and ignore any adjustment in the handset amount or percentage.
I will be very thankful to hear from you soon as I am building an excel model to calculate this process.
Thanks in advance
Amr El Hefny
Silvia
THanks for your response. Appreciated
Can you elaborate on section/s in IFRS 15 which will support a different allocation of consideration in such a situation?
Saji, I’ve done this – it’s in my IFRS Kit. Have a nice day! S.
Hi Silvia
That was a superfast response. Thanks.
Not sure whether my message was confusing. CU 290 is the cost of handset to ABC.The revenue allocation based on stand alone selling prices of POs (as in the example) will result in ABC recording a loss in handset sale and profit in network services. This does not reflect the real commercial sense of the transaction.Is there a IFRS supported way to avoid this anomaly. Para 82 is not helpful where the POs are not sold separately at a discount to their stand alone selling prices.
Saji,
Now I got you – I read too quickly and interchanged “cost” for “revenue”. But yes, it’s possible under IFRS 15.
Hi Sylvia
Came across your site accidentally while searching for IFRS 15 material. Need to congratulate you for the simplified explanation for such a complex subject.
I have a question on the example provided. Does the revenue allocation change if the cost of handset is CU 290? If not, aren’t we inflating the revenue from network services?
Hi Saji,
of course, the allocation would change a bit. The way of calculation is the same, just the numbers change. S.
Many thanks for this article! It’s the best explanation I have read so far. I really like that you explained everything using an example
Sorry for silly question…but what is the meaning of FP in the example? Is it an abbreviation of an account where the debit is being posted?
Sorry, I should have clarified. It’s a financial position – or the statement of financial position (balance sheet). S.
Hi Sylvia – great article thank you. In your intro to the Telecoms example you make the assumption that the customer does not exceed the bundle. In reality this does happen as roamed calls and international calls are outside the bundle. How should these be dealt with under IFRS 15? Should they be considered as part of the contract or as new contracts (modifications) in each instance?
Thank you
Rob.
Hi Rob,
it depends on the contract, its specific conditions, etc. – there’s no unified answer. I would need far more place than 1 comment to elaborate on that, but let me give you a brief hint: anyway, roamed/international calls are billed separately by the amount actually spent, isn’t it? If this is the case, then it seems like a distinct performance obligation satisfied at the point of time. I guess you don’t really make additional contract or contract amendment and clients agree up front to pay separately for these calls. If this is the case, then you simply recognise revenues for these calls at the point of time – when they occur based on actual amounts. Hope it helps! S.
There is a difference between IAS 18 and IFRS 15 on the disclosures of the figures.
In IFRS 15, we have asset and liability for a revenue but in IAS 18 all the transactions are on the asset.
My question what ‘is the accounting scheme with the new model IFRS 15 between Asset and liability .
Thank you
Ias 18 defines revenue ( the gross inflow of economic benefits during the period arising in the course of ordinary activities of an entity when those inflows results i increases in equity , other than increases relating to contributions from equity participants ) but IFRS 15 defines revenue as ( income arising in the course of an entity’s ordinary activities ) IF We See the definition of income (( increases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of inflows or enhancement of assets or decreases of liability that result in an increase in equity , other than those relating to contributions from equity participants …. ?? Why u say that in the above example that there is a difference between these two definitions??? Are u relate the answer by including only the criteria of inflow of money in IAS 18 definition ? But in IFRS 15 revenue will be arise as a result of increasing performance so decrease in liability ,,, thanks in advance
Sorry, Dalia, I don’t get it. Where do I say there’s a difference between these two definitions? Anyway, this was a practical illustration and I do not understand how you relate the definitions of a revenue to this particular example.
Why there is a different in definitions of revenue between IAS 18 and IFRS 15 ?
Hi Dalia, well, IAS 18 did not cover complex transactions well and IFRS 15 is more precise in this. Anyway, you should be more specific in your question. S.
Hi Silvia,
Your example of explaining IFRS 15 was really great. I would request you to please take a complete example with calculations showing us what the retrospective calculations would be in the above example if the customer goes for a two year contract with ABC starting from 1st July 2015
Hi Silvia! Was wondering how set-up costs are accounted for under IFRS 15. Are they added to the network services or handset allocation assuming the fee is $79.95? Thanks!
Hi Gordon,
id depends on what is the set-up costs. Do they represent some transfer of good or service to a customer? Or are they internal costs in order to prepare for performance (e.g. investment into a new system, or preparation of the site for the construction…)?
If the first one is the case, then the transfer would be a separate performance obligation and yes, you need to allocate a part of transaction price to it.
If there is no transfer to a customer, then set up costs are “contract costs” and you would either treat them under IAS 16/38/40 if possible, or capitalize and amortize them over the contract life if they qualify, or expense them in P/L if they do not qualify. IFRS 15 sets exact rules. S.
Hi Silvia,
This is a great article! I am wondering what do you think about how IFRS 15 will impact the recruitment industry?
Thanks:)
can we say that the change to ifrs 15 was necessary and is it an improvement? if so why?
Because unlike the current guidance, IFRS 15 provides unified framework and unified rules for every revenue generating transaction (with some exceptions). Also, as the rules are more detailed, the entities cannot interpret them in their own way as until now and as a result, financial statements will be more comparable among companies.
hie good people can you assist me with the differences between ias 18 and ifrs 15
I am from ICAI & Member of ICAI . I am thinking to affilated with online course & provide the training in nepal
Hi Silvia – We are waiting for your new article. Is it published? Thanks.
Hi Poonam,
article about what? About IFRS 15? Yes, it’s been published and I sent you the e-mail about it (if you are subscribed to my newsletter). The article is here: http://www.cpdbox.com/ifrs-15-examples/
Enjoy! S.
Lovely but my concern is simply now accounting is becoming more and more difficult to understand for non accountant …life is enough complicated..
Any way thanks very clear
how about the subscription fee for a service rather than a sale of software with incidental support services? how is the revenue recognized? would IFRS 15 have huge impact on revenues?
Hi,
If normal credit period allowed to customer is 30 days and to few customer its 180 days.How revenue should be bifurcated between Revenue and Interest revenue in both the above cases as per IAS 18.
Hi Gulshan,
if the customer under credit term of 180 days pays you more than cash price equivalent, then the difference is the interest revenue (and cash price equivalent is revenue for your goods/services). You should allocate it to the individual periods by the effective interest method (find your internal rate of return), while your total period is 180 days.
If the client pays you the same amount as under cash price equivalent, then you should discount the amount to be received by the interest rate applicable for similar instruments in the market and recognize discounted amount as revenue.
Hope it helps! S.
Hi Silivia,
Could you please advise how should a company record compensation received (based on performance bond / letter of guarantee) from contractor for not fulfilling construction requirements .
Appreciate advising also on IFRS reference
Hi Silvia,
Based on the example you provides, could you explain how to record the cost entry under IAS 18 and IFRS 15? Thanks a lot for your help.
Hi Yvonne, I’m not sure what you mean by “cost entry”. Can you please specify?
Thanks for Illustration of IFRS 15 in a simple way.
Kindly also provide practical implication of IAS 11 as per new IFRS 15.
Thanks.
Hi Silvia,
Please could you explain to me what modification of contract mean in IFRS 15 in a simple way. Also what are the impacts the new revenue standard has on businesses. Thanks.
Hi Bridget, very simply – modification is a change in the contract terms, e.g. change in the scope, price or whatever. It can give rise to new obligations and rights, therefore sometimes, you need to account for it as for the new contract.
To your second question – it’s not so easy to respond in the comment. Therefore, I plan to issue new article about this topic sometimes in February – March 15, so stay tuned 🙂 Have a nice day!
This article rocks! And you rock!
Hi
Thanks for the great explanation you did in the article.
I really enjoyed reading it.
great work.
Thanks for the update, Sylvia. I have been trying to raise awareness in my company for these upcoming changes in order to comply with the new standard (my organization deals with complex revenue arrangements in media, entertainment, intellectual property rights, bundled deals, services, hardware, software)
I am curious what systems (i.e. not a large ERP system) do practitioners out there see as the leading edge and/or best practices.
Unfortunately, error prone, labor-intensive spreadsheets seem to rule the day. I don’t see this changing, unless a low cost solution is out there that has escaped me.
Input from you or the community appreciated.
Dear Reginald,
I guess I’m not the best person to answer this. However, I hope there’s someone reading it and can advise you on great information systems that are able to spit out info as needed. As far as I know, SAP modules work nicely. But I agree with you that excel still rules 🙂 S.
I mean if lessee (the one who rent the building) terminated the contract. thanks 🙂
Dear Mohamed,
it depends on the past experience of the lessor with similar cases and the specifics in the contract, but I would normally account for the lease 8-10 years and then settled the lease when the premature termination happens. S.
Hi Silvia,
You have a talent in making standards easily understandable. thanks a lot..
A real estate company that rent buildings for 8 to 10 years and the contract includes a clause that if the lessor terminated the contract he shall pay 50% of the total lease amount. how should the real estate company account for this clause/ the contract as a whole?
Appreciate receiving your advice..
Hi Silvia,
Your article is excellent. You are guiding us really well. Thank you for your efforts in making us understand IFRS 15.
Can you share few illustrative examples of construction or contracting or engineering or EPC (Engineering, Procurement and Construction) company/industry?
Also in case of say EPC Company, how the advances from customers will be treated as per IFRS 15? can you explain with some practical example this?
Regards,
Akhil
Hi Akhil,
thank you for your nice comment.
Yes, I will do an article about IFRS 15 vs. IAS 11 as the construction contracts leave some confusion. But give me some time for this 🙂
All the best
S.
In case you really make a version for construction contracts
plz keep me updated
wonderfull work!
Hi Silvia,
its a really great work you are doing Silvia- much appreciated!!
Would you be able to tell me how this IFRS will impact revenue recognition of construction contracts – we are having two types of contracts 1) fixed price where we are recognizing revenue on POC basis and others are open ended time and material contracts where we are recognizing revenue based on agreed invoices.
Will appreciate your help.
Regards,
Irfan
Hi
According to my view, IAS 18 also requires to recognise revenue separately to multiple components of one single transaction.
Para 13 of IAS 18:
However, in certain circumstances, it is necessary to apply the
recognition criteria to the separately identifiable components of a single transaction in order to reflect the substance of the transaction. For example,when the selling price of a product includes an identifiable amount for subsequent servicing, that amount is deferred and recognised as revenue over the period during which the service is performed.
Hence, if we apply para 13 of IAS 18, than separately identifiable components in a transaction are handset and monthly plan and than revenue to be recognised accordingly. Hence, no difference between IAS 18 and IFRS 15 for this.
Kindly let me know your views.
Hello,
my example is very simplified and only illustrative. But it’s a great question and I added a few words to the article to clarify it a bit more.
Unfortunately, IAS 18 does not give a guidance on how to identify separate transaction and as a result, telecom companies applied different accounting practices, for example:
– some telecom companies simply treated the cost of free handset as a cost of acquiring the customer (marketing cost) and accounted for revenue as described above
– many telecom companies did identify separate transactions (sale of handset and monthly plan), but then they applied “residual” method and really, they limited the revenue for the sale of handset to the amount paid by the customer for the handset. As an example, search for France Telecom financial statements.
Under IFRS 15, these methods will not be permitted. Hope it helps! S.
This is great Silvia.
It will really help me on my assignment.
please keep it up.
Dickson Kalinga
Student University of Malawi.