IAS 19 Employee Benefits
Last update: July 2023
Standard IAS 19 Employee Benefits prescribes rules for recognition and presentation of various types of benefits that employers provide to their employees.
Have you ever read about employee benefits that the best employer in the world—Google provides to its employees? Just to name a few of them (besides great salaries): Free haircuts, gourmet food, high-tech cleansing toilets, on-site medical care, travel insurance, fun stuff around the office, paid maternity leave…
Well, Google even introduced “death benefit”—so if a Google employee dies during his employment, his spouse continues to receive 50% of employee’s annual salary for the next decade.
But now, look at it as a CFO. No problem to account for the benefits such as salaries or free haircuts. But what about that death benefit? The issue here is that the benefit is not paid while the employee is in service… only after it. And Google really does not know when the employees die and thus the liability becomes payable.
So that’s where IAS 19 plays its crucial role. It tells us how to account for various kinds of employee benefits and how to present them in the financial statements.
Why IAS 19?
The main objective of IAS 19 is to prescribe the accounting and disclosure for employee benefits. IAS 19 requires and entity to recognize:
- a liability when an employee has provided service in exchange for employee benefits to be paid in the future; and
- an expense when the entity consumes the economic benefit arising from service provided by an employee in exchange for employee benefits.
That’s the clear demonstration of matching principle—to recognize an expense in the period when matching revenue is recognized.
So, Google should recognize the liability for its death benefit when the employee actually works (and not when he dies); and the expense when the results of employee’s work are consumed.
Classification of Employee Benefits
IAS 19 classifies employee benefits into 4 main categories:
- Short-term employee benefits= employee benefits (other than termination benefits) that are expected to be settled wholly before twelve months after the end of the annual reporting period in which the employees render the related service.
- Post-employment benefits= employee benefits (other than termination benefits and short-term employee benefits) that are payable after the completion of employment.
- Other long-term benefits= all employee benefits other than short-term employee benefits, post-employment benefits and termination benefits.
- Termination benefits= employee benefits provided in exchange for the termination of an employee’s employment as a result of either:
- (a) an entity’s decision to terminate an employee’s employment before the normal retirement date; or
- (b) an employee’s decision to accept an offer of benefits in exchange for the termination of employment.
Now, what do you think—in which category does the Google’s death benefit fall? 🙂 Go on reading and you’ll see!
Short-term Employee Benefits
Short-term employee benefits include all the following items (if payable within 12 months after the end of the reporting period):
- wages, salaries and social security contributions;
- paid annual leave and paid sick leave;
- profit-sharing and bonuses; and
- non-monetary benefits (such as medical care, housing, cars and free or subsidized goods for current employees). Well, all Google’s expenses for free haircuts or gourmet food probably belong to this category.
How to account for short-term benefits
The entity shall recognize short-term employee benefits as an expense to profit or loss (unless another IFRS requires or permits the inclusion of the benefits in the cost of an asset).
The expense shall be recognized in the undiscounted amount of short-term employee benefits expected to be paid in exchange for employee’s service rendered during an accounting period.
The accounting entry is as follows:
Short-term paid absences: Expected cost of short-term paid absences shall be recognized when the employees render service that increases their entitlement to future paid absences (in the case of accumulating paid absences); or when the absences occur (in the case of non-accumulating paid absences).
Profit sharing and bonuses: An entity shall recognize the expected cost of profit-sharing and bonus payments when the entity has a present legal or constructive obligation to make such payments as a result of past events; and a reliable estimate of the obligation can be made. A present obligation exists when, and only when, the entity has no realistic alternative but to make the payments.
Post-Employment Benefits
Post-employment benefits include items such as various pensions, retirement benefits, post-employment life insurance and post-employment medical care.
There are 2 basic types of post-employment benefits:
- Defined contribution plans
- Defined benefit plans
It is absolutely crucial to know the difference between the two and to classify your post-employment benefit correctly, as the accounting treatment is totally different for each of them.
Defined Contribution Plans
Defined contribution plans are post-employment benefit plans under which an entity pays fixed contributions into a separate entity (a fund) and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employee benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior periods.
How to account for defined contribution plans
The employer shall recognize contributions payable to a defined contribution plan as an expense to profit or loss (unless another IFRS requires or permits the inclusion of the benefits in the cost of an asset).
When the contributions are not expected to be settled wholly before twelve months after the end of the reporting period, they shall be discounted.
The accounting entry is as follows:
Defined Benefit Plans
Defined benefit plans are post-employment benefit plans other than defined contribution plans. Under defined benefit plan, the employer has the obligation to pay specified amount of benefits according to the plan to the employee and all investment and actuarial risk thus fall on the entity.
And here we come to an answer to the Google question: without having any further details on the benefit, I would classify Google’s death benefit as defined benefit plan in line with IAS 19, because:
- It is paid out after the completion of employment (after employee dies, remember?)
- Google’s obligation is not limited to the contributions to some fund; instead, Google’s obligation depends on the future salary levels and thus actuarial risk falls on Google.
Accounting for defined benefit plans is probably one of the most complex issues in IFRS because it involves incorporating actuarial assumptions into measurement of the obligation and the expenses. Therefore, actuarial gain and losses arise. Also, obligations are measured on a discounted basis, because they might be settled many years after the employees render the related services.
How to account for defined benefit plans
The employers shall perform the following steps in order to account for the defined benefit plan:
Step 1: Determine Deficit or Surplus
Deficit or surplus is a difference between the present value of defined benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets as at the end of the reporting period. In order to determine it, the entity must:
- Estimate the ultimate cost of a benefit.
The entity must use projected unit credit method to estimate how much the employees have earned for their work in the current and prior periods, to attribute the benefit to the periods of service and to incorporate estimates about demographic and financial variables (“actuarial assumptions”) into calculations. - Discount the benefit in order to determine the present value of the defined benefit obligation and the current service cost.
- Deduct the fair value of any plan assets from the present value of the defined benefit obligation.
For simple illustration of projected unit credit method, please watch the following video:
Step 2: Determine amount in the statement of financial position
Although there is quite enough numbers involved in accounting for defined benefit plan, IAS 19 requires to present them as 1 single amount in the statement of financial position – the net defined benefit liability (asset), which is basically deficit or surplus calculated in the step 1, but adjusted for the effect of asset ceiling.
Asset ceiling is the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in the future contributions to the plan.
Step 3: Determine amount in the profit or loss
The entity shall present the following amounts to profit or loss:
- Current service cost = the increase in the present value of the defined benefit obligation resulting from employee service in the current period;
- Any past service cost = the change in the present value of the defined benefit obligation for employee service in prior periods, resulting from a plan amendment or a curtailment
- Any gain or loss on settlement
- Net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset) = the change in the net defined benefit liability (asset) during the period due to passage of time (“unwinding the discount”)
Step 4: Determine remeasurements in other comprehensive income
The entity shall present the following remeasurements to other comprehensive income:
- Actuarial gains and losses = the changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation resulting from experience adjustments or the effects of changes in actuarial assumptions
- Return on plan assets, excluding amounts included in net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset)
- Any change in the effect of the asset ceiling.
Other long-term benefits
Other long-term benefits include the following items (if not expected to be settled within 12 months after the end of the period in which the employee renders the related service):
- long-term paid absences such as long-service or sabbatical leave;
- jubilee or other long-service benefits;
- long-term disability benefits;
- profit-sharing and bonuses; and
- deferred remuneration.
How to account for other long-term benefits
As other long-term benefits are not subject to so much uncertainty as defined benefit plans, the accounting treatment is a bit easier.
However, the entity should perform the same steps as I have described at defined benefit plans. The only difference is that all items such as service cost, net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset) and remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability (asset) are presented in the profit or loss – so nothing goes to other comprehensive income.
Termination benefits
Termination benefits represent quite a different cup of tea than the previous 3 categories. Why? Because they are not provided in exchange for the service of the employee; instead, they are provided in exchange for the termination of employment.
However, be careful here, because the termination benefit sometimes includes the benefit for BOTH the termination of employment AND the service of employee at the same time.
For example, a company closes one of its production plants and offers the bonus of 1 000 USD to all employees who will be laid off. But because this company needs qualified people to perform the closure, it offers the bonus of 3 000 USD to each employee who stays with the company until the closure is completed.
In this small example, the bonus of 1 000 USD paid to all fired employees represents termination benefit and additional 2 000 USD paid to all employees who stay until the closure is completed represents the benefit for the employee’s service, mostly classified as other long-term benefit in line with IAS 19.
How to account for termination benefits
The primary question here is WHEN to recognize the liability and expense for termination benefits. It is at the earlier of:
- when the company can no longer withdraw the offer of those benefits (either the termination plan exists or employee accepts the offer of benefits) and
- when the company recognizes cost for a restructuring (IAS 37) and involves the payment of termination benefits.
The next question is HOW to recognize termination benefits. This depends on the specific terms of the benefits:
- if the termination benefits are expected to be settled wholly before 12 months after the end of the reporting period, then we should apply the requirements for short-term employee benefits (so recognize it as an expense to profit or loss on undiscounted basis)
- if the termination benefits are not expected to be settled wholly before 12 months after the end of the reporting period, then we should apply the requirements for other long-term employee benefits (so recognize it as an expense to profit or loss on discounted basis)
Please watch the following video summarizing IAS 19:
Related posts
- How to Account for Employee Loans – if you provide interest-free or below-market-rate loans to your employees, then you effectively provide employee benefits. Learn here how to account for them.
- Top Excel Formulas for IFRS —learn several Excel formulas for dealing with your own benefits + download the Excel file!
- How to Extrapolate Along Yield Curve—this helps you to set your discount rate for discounting the benefits
JOIN OUR FREE NEWSLETTER AND GET
report "Top 7 IFRS Mistakes" + free IFRS mini-course
Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.
Recent Comments
- yannick on How to Account for Government Grants (IAS 20)
- Silvia on What are directly attributable costs?
- Tamizan Nanji on What are directly attributable costs?
- Ahmad Yaghoobnezhad on Current or Non-Current?
- Sanaz on IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Categories
- Accounting Policies and Estimates (14)
- Consolidation and Groups (24)
- Current Assets (21)
- Financial Instruments (55)
- Financial Statements (52)
- Foreign Currency (9)
- IFRS Videos (70)
- Insurance (3)
- Most popular (6)
- Non-current Assets (54)
- Other Topics (15)
- Provisions and Other Liabilities (44)
- Revenue Recognition (26)
- Uncategorized (1)
Suppose at the end of fiscal year there are still 20 days unused accumulating (non vesting) leaves and at the beginning of the next month I use those leaves. How shall I treat those leaves in two fiscal year?
Hi Silvia,
Good Day!!!
Thanks for sharing such an insightful article and making this difficult standard looks easy.
I have a query, why the remeasurement gain / loss arises in defined benefit plan is charged to OCI whereas in other long term benefit plan it is charged to Profit / loss account. I am confused because the nature of remeasurement is same in both cases but why there is a different treatment?
Hope to hear from you soon.
The course presentation including video is very helpful. Many thanks to Silvia for presenting the IFRS’s in the easiest way.
I want to inquire about past service cost, like if our Plan Improves our future obligations would increase and thus PV of benefit obligation, now assuming that plan improves on first day of reporting period. Whether we would charge Interest on the increased PV on that at Year end?
Dear Mrs. Silvia,
Good day.
I would appreciate your confirmation on the following:
The Defined Benefit Cost that is recognized in Other Comprehensive Income is it part of the Distributable Reserves or Not Distributable Reserves.
Thanking you very much in advance.
Hi. I am a Pensioner in a Defined Benefit Plan sponsored by my former Employer, a University. The plan must undergo statutory oversight valuations each three years. In 2016-2018 it was sufficiently underfunded that the Employer and Fund (a separate legal entity) had to devise a “scheme” to rectify the problem. The scheme involved an agreement from the Employer to pay a series of 36 monthly special contributions, beginning January 2020. (I call this the “backfill”). The backfill matches the assessed deficit at the end of 2018. In my view this brings the fund to a 100% funding level.
But the Fund refused to accrue the Employer’s “promise” as an asset, arguing instead that it had to be treated on a cash-basis and only reflected once the money arrived in the Fund’s account. So the Fund declared an underfunded position for 1 January 2019, and again for 1 January 2020, in spite of better-than-expected investment returns and a substantial Actuarial improvement during 2019. But we have a legal requirement that says Trustees may not grant increases that put the Fund into financial trouble. So all Pension increases for 2020 were denied to us because of the accounting treatment of the backfill.
Can anyone point me to any accounting standards that dictate how the Fund must treat a backfill that takes place as a series of payments over time? Most of what I see so far in IAS 19 tells us how the Employer should account for things.
Thanks for any insights.
Kind Regards
Hi Ms. Silvia,
May I ask an issue regarding not provisioning / accruing retirement benefit obligation, for few employees and then, suddenly an employee retires for the year. In effect the company recorded an expense and still there is no accrual of retirement benefit obligation {RBO} for the employees. Come next year, the company opt to accrue for the RBO, will the company restate its prior year financial statements to make it comparative and to recognize the past service cost?
If yes, how will the company computes for the past service cost?
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Manoj Siri
Hi Silvia,
Our company pays the premium for medical insurance of staff for one year. If the policy period ends after the accounting period, should the prepaid insurance expense be recorded?
Thanks
The employee has an accommodation fringe benefit. Is the the cash equivalent of the accommodation fringe benefit an expense to the entity. Please also provide me with a technical reference.
Hi Silvia, if the employee A have liability balance for defined benefit plans 100UC then they resign and only got 10UC (not retired yet) how to account the 100UC? straight to PL or OCI, I don’t know why the actuary always put the 90 UC to OCI not gain or loss on settlement. please advise
Hi silva,
Could you plz explain the accounting treatment of leave encashment, and wherher there are rules regulating this.
Thank you
What do you mean by “leave encashment”? Is that some bonus that an employee receives when he/she terminates the employment? You have to look to terms of this bonus, especially what is it provided for and then classify it into one of the categories I mentioned above. Most often this will be other employee benefit, but it could be something else based on the terms.
thanks a lot . very good.
Heartiest Welcome Silvia!!!
your explanation is awesome.
I have just one query, that what are these we call plan assets? Are these some kind of investment made from DBP?
Dilemma:
1. according to the local labor law, employees receive 2x average salary upon retirement
2. so far, the company has calculated a provision for the beneft for all employees employed as of balance sheet date who are not in notice period
3. assued that the management board has extra retirement remunerations defined in their contracts, would it be correct to account also for those [having in mind though, that the boad has a contractually defined mandate and they have at least 20 years to go to retirement?)
4. I’m wandering since also for the other employees there is no assurance they Will stay until retirement and yet we do provide for the provision
What’s your opinion?
Dear kindly provide an example of accumulating and non accumulating absence leave with entries
Dear Silvia,
First of all I would like to extend our gratitude to you for your informative and valuable contribution to make IFRS as easy as possible.
I have question for termination benefits. Our entity provides the employees with medical insurance plan for few years if they accept to leave the entity. This is a typical termination benefits, right?
Now if the insurance premium would be paid by the entity in the future and it has no other obligation other than insurance claim, can’t paragraph IAS19.46 would be applicable here and consider the plan and insured benefits?
Appreciate your prompt feedback.
Thanks
Hi Ramzi,
if that benefit is provided as a result of termination of employment, then yes, this is a termination benefit, because it is given in return for terminating, not for the employee’s service as such. The paragraph IAS 19.46 does NOT apply here, because this is the insurance premium for medical treatment itself, and not the insurance to fund some other defined benefit plan. Moreover, we are talking about termination benefits, NOT post-employment benefits as defined by IAS 19, because the reason for the benefit was termination – thus you should apply the accounting treatment in line with par. IAS 19.159 and following.
Hi Silvia,
Please assist on computation of bonus provision. Say a company computes the provision based on 10% of net surplus, do we adjust to take out property revaluation and exchange rate gains from the surplus before calculating the 10% bonus?
Thanks. It is great and simple to understand
Hi there
I must compliment you on this site. It is so easy to understand and I love the debits and credits. I just need to confirm what my entries will be for directors 7th schedule fringe benefits for use of home and motor vehicle.
Thanking you in advance
Hi Silvia,
The reconciliation from OB to CB for provisions for defined long term benefits according to domestic standards (simplified) looks like this (under conditions there are not separate assets to cover provisions):
provisions for future benefits at the beginning of period (OB) =
– benefits due within accounting period (paid and outstanding)
+ interest costs
+ current service costs
-/+ actuarial gains/losses
+/- past service costs
= provisions for future benefits at the end of period (CB)
In case we replace the first element of the above statement (that means ‘benefits due’) with ‘benefit paid’ within accounting period (according to par. 141 g) then the provisions at OB and CB cannot contain only future obligations as it seems to be inconsistent.
Perhaps my understanding of paragraph 141 g is incorrect.
Best regards
Iwona
Please remove sign “=” after (OB)
Hi Silvia,
I am an actuary (not an accountant) and I already wrote to you about 3 years ago finding your answers very helpful. This time I would like to ask about reconciliation from the OB to the CB for provisions for employee defined long term benefits. I do not have any problem regarding the matter in case of our domestic accounting requirements as in this case both, the OB and the CB amounts, include provisions only for future benefits which are exactly provisions calculated by actuarial methods (according to PUCM methodology required by IAS 19) and, in order to reconcile the OB with the CB, the benefits due within the current financial period (paid or/and outstanding) are taken as an item of the statement (the outstanding benefits are transferred from the reserves to the current liabilities).
But I am not sure how it should look like in case of international accounting standards. My doubts arise from the fact that according to IAS 19 par. 141 g the paid benefits should be taken (without distinguishing the maturity period) and this implies that the provision for both the OB and CB should also include current liabilities, so the amounts determined by actuarial methods (that concern only future benefits) should be increased by outstanding (current) benefits. Is it true or not? Or maybe it is not entirely determined by standards but depends on the company’s bookkeeping policy. I would be very grateful for the answer.
Best regards
Iwona
Hi Iwona,
yes, I remember. Well, I am not really good in abbreviations. Please, what is OB and CB?
opening balance & closing balance
Hi Silvia,
Although this is not directly related to employee benefits IAS, but request your expertise on this practical problem:
The parent company has declared bonus to employees of the entire group although the group did not perform well in the current year. The subsidiary companies as a result (bad performance of the group) had not budgeted for any bonus charge. Should the bonus cost then still be allocated to each subsidiary or can the cost be charged to the parent company considering the subsidiary companies have no part to play in this?
Please note that the parent company does not have any employees in its books.
Hi Silvia,
can you explain more about gain/loss on settlement on P/L? I mean whats the component there?. lets say the company have provision for retirement benefit for employee A amounted 100USD, but if the respective employee resigned in next year and only get paid 10USD, since in the components retirement benefit plan only get full amount if reach retirement age. so will 100USD-10USD= 90USD directly go to gain on settlement? or to OCI? kindly clarify
Thanks and Warm regards,
Adam
Hi Silvia, can you please advise on the following case. Company will pay staff $600 every 3 years. Should i 1) spread $600 (ignore discount for this example) and recognised expense of $200 every year with corresponding entry to accruals? 2) Estimate the length of time employee will stay with the Company and the estimated amount of claims throughout the employment ?
Hi Jay, not clear for me if 600 is paid to any employee who is in service for the whole 3 years, or only to employee who is in service as at the date of payment, or what are the conditions? See, without this information I can’t really tell you.
Best
S.
Hello Silvia,
Could you please advise your opinion re the following case. Company will pay bonuses to employees at the amount of 5% from annual profit, but only if annual profit exceeds 50 mln. By the end of third quarter profit for 9 months equals 30 mln. Should we accrue liability and expense related to this bonus at the end of third quarter as 3/4 from 5% on estimated annual amount of profit or we should not accrue any liability because the condition for bonuses was not met at the end of third quarter?
Dear Irina,
you should make a reliable estimate of the amount. Having that said – you should assess the pattern of generating profits in your company based on the past experience and try to estimate whether there is any chance that the profit will exceed 50 mil. E.g. some companies have “busy season” in December before Christmas and generate 30% of total annual sales in that single month. If your profit generating pattern is smooth over the year, then the estimate of your liability is probably zero. S.
Hello Silva,
Many thanks for the lecture on IAS 19. What will be the accounting entries for the actuarial gain or loss.
Hello. Please explain the treatment of contribution made by employee in defined benefit plan. Paragraph 92 and 93 of IAS 19. Can you please explain via illustrative example. Thanks!
Hello Silvia, Thanks for this insightful tutorial on IAS 19.
Permit me to seek your guidance on a scenario. A company ‘rewards’ employees who have worked for a period of 5 years with a defined amount of money and has communicated same to its employees. Since the amounts are immaterial and has a high staff turnover (a normal phenomenon in the industry), it looks at its staff roll and is able to tell those employees who will qualify for this reward in a particular year. It provides for it accordingly, and pays it when it due. Is this wrong?
Hi Paa,
well, strictly applying IAS 19 – yes, it is wrong, because this is “other employee benefit” and you should attribute some part of it to each of employee’s service (while taking staff turnover etc. into account when estimating a liability). But, if you estimate and can prove that this would have immaterial impact on your financial statements, then OK – it is still wrong, but immaterial.