How to Capitalize Borrowing Costs under IAS 23
Should you capitalize or not?
When it comes to determining the cost of your assets, most standards ask to include all directly attributable items.
What about interest and other borrowing costs?
Did you know that if you have 10 dollars in your pocket and no debt, then you are wealthier than 25% of all Americans? Trust me – the corporate scene is no different!
Well, let’s be honest, borrowing money does carry a cost, and sometimes very significant one.
Here, I’m not talking about the loss of your friends or even family members, but all these quantifiable items such as interest and similar cost.
As these are often directly attributable to the acquisition of assets, they should be capitalized.
Some time ago, the standard IAS 23 Borrowing Costs gave you a choice:
- Either you could put all your borrowing costs directly in profit or loss and thus you did not have to worry about capitalizing them, or
- You could capitalize eligible borrowing costs.
Unfortunately, this choice was removed a few years ago for most of assets, and now you have to capitalize.
How?
In this article, I tried to draft a few basic rules about capitalizing borrowing costs and also, I reply to 3 most common questions received from you.
Let’s dive in.
Let’s talk basics: What does IAS 23 Borrowing Costs say?
The core principle of IAS 23 Borrowing Costs is that you should capitalize borrowing costs if they are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset.
Other borrowing costs are expensed in profit or loss.
Here, let me clarify 3 essential issues:
What are qualifying assets?
Qualifying assets are assets that take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use or sale.
Note here that IAS 23 does not say it must necessarily be an item of a property, plant and equipment under IAS 16. It can also include some inventories or intangibles, too!
But what is a “substantial period of time”?
Well, that’s not defined in IAS 23, so here you need to apply some judgment. Normally, if an asset takes more than 1 year to be ready, then it would be qualifying.
What can we capitalize?
IAS 23 specifically mentions 3 types of borrowing costs that can be capitalized:
- Interest expenses (refer to the effective interest method under IFRS 9/IAS 39);
- Finance charges on leases under IFRS 16 Leases; and
- Exchange differences on borrowings in foreign currencies, but only those representing the adjustment to interest costs.
However, IAS 23 is pretty silent on some types of expenses and there are doubts whether they are borrowing costs or not, for example:
- Interest cost on derivatives used to manage interest rate risk on borrowings;
- Dividends payable on preference shares (or other types of shares classified as liabilities);
- Gains or losses arising from early repayment of borrowings, etc.
Here again, we need to apply our knowledge from other IFRS standards and sometimes, make a judgment, too.
How do you capitalize?
IAS 23 differentiates between capitalizing borrowing costs on general borrowings and specific borrowings.
Specific borrowings
If you borrowed some funds specifically for the acquisition of a qualifying asset, then the capitalization is easy:
You simply capitalize the actual costs incurred less any income earned on the temporary investment of such borrowings.
Let me give you a short example:
Question:
On 1st May 20X1, DEF took a loan of CU 1 000 000 from a bank at the annual interest rate of 5%. The purpose of this loan was to finance a construction of a production hall.
The construction started on 1 June 20X1. DEF temporarily invested CU 800 000 borrowed money during the months of June and July 20X1 at the rate of 2% p.a.
What borrowing cost can be capitalized in 20X1? (Assume all interest was paid).
Answer:
Although the funds were withdrawn on 1st May, the capitalization can start only on 1st June 20X1 when all criteria were met (the construction had not started until 1st June).
Calculation:
- Interest expense: CU 1 000 000 x 5% x 7/12 = CU 29 167
Note: this is very simplified calculation and if the loan is repayable in installments, then you need to take the real interest incurred (by the effective interest method). - Less investment income: CU 800 000 x 2% x 2/12 = CU 2 667
- Total borrowing cost to capitalize in 20X1: CU 26 500
Just don’t forget that the borrowing cost in May 20X1 is expensed in profit or loss, as the capitalization criteria were not met in that period.
General borrowings
Now, there’s more trouble with capitalizing general borrowings, as you need to prepare a bit more calculations.
General borrowings are those funds that are obtained for various purposes and they are used (apart from these other purposes) also for the acquisition of a qualifying asset.
In this case, you need to apply so-called capitalization rate to the borrowing funds on that asset, calculated as the weighted average of the borrowing costs applicable to general pool.
To illustrate it, let me give you an example about capitalizing borrowing costs on general borrowings.
Question:
KLM had the following loans in place at the beginning and end of 20X1:
Description | 1 January 20X1 | 31 December 20X1 |
Bank loan, 6% p.a. | 0 | 200 000 |
Bank loan, 8% p.a. | 130 000 | 130 000 |
Debenture stock, 5.5% p.a. | 50 000 | 50 000 |
The bank loan at 6% p.a. was taken in July 20X1 to finance the construction of a new production hall (construction began on 1 March 20X1).
The bank loan at 8% p.a. and debenture stock were taken for no specific purpose and KLM used them to finance general spending and the construction of a new machinery.
KLM used CU 60 000 for the construction of the machinery on 1 February 20X1 and CU 25 000 on 1 September 20X1.
What borrowing cost should be capitalized for the new machinery?
Answer:
You ignore bank loan at 6% p.a., because it is a specific borrowing for another asset.
Only general borrowings relate to the financing of the new machinery and therefore, we need to calculate the capitalization rate:
- Weighted average rate = (8% x 130 000 /(130 000+50 000)) + (5.5% x 50 000/(130 000+50 000)) = 5.78%+ 1.53% = 7.31%
- Borrowing costs for the new machinery in 20X1 = CU 60 000 x 7.31% x 11/12 + CU 25 000 x 7.31% x 4/12 = CU 4 021 + CU 609 = CU 4 630.
The hottest questions in capitalizing borrowing cost
After we know the basics, let me give you my opinion on 3 the most common and often questions I get in relation to capitalizing borrowing cost.
I receive these questions quite often, so let me shed some light there.
Question #1: Can you capitalize interest cost in the cost of inventories?
It depends.
In most cases, inventories do not take a substantial period to get ready and in this case no, you cannot capitalize.
But here, there are some examples of inventories that can take a substantial period to complete:
- Wine, cheese or whiskey that matures in bottle or cask for a long period of time;
- Large items of equipment, such as aircraft, ships etc.
In this case, you can capitalize borrowing cost, but it’s up to you if you will or won’t.
While you have no choice for PPE (you have to capitalize), you have a choice for inventories: either you capitalize, or expense in profit or loss.
Question #2: Can you capitalize foreign exchange loss on specifically borrowed money in a foreign currency?
No, you cannot do it fully.
Yes, IAS 23 says that exchange differences on foreign currency borrowings are a borrowing cost to the extent that they are regarded as an adjustment of interest cost.
Simply speaking – you can capitalize the difference between the interest on the foreign currency loan and the hypothetical interest expense in your own (functional currency), because that’s regarded as borrowing cost.
The rest must be expensed in profit or loss.
Question #3: Can you capitalize interest cost on intercompany loan for qualifying assets?
Yes, in the separate financial statements of the borrowing company.
However, be a bit careful about the consolidated financial statements, because based on the intercompany relationship (subsidiary or associate?), the intercompany loan might be eliminated.
Also, let me point out one more issue in relation to intercompany loans: often, they are provided interest-free.
Under IFRS 9, you should recognize almost all financial instruments at their fair value (sometimes plus transaction cost) and if a subsidiary gets an interest-free loan from a parent, it’s nominal amount is not at fair value.
Therefore, a subsidiary needs to set the fair value of the loan received using the market interest rates and book the difference between the loan’s fair value and the cash received in profit or loss (based on the substance of a transaction).
Then, interest expense calculated by the effective interest method is capitalized.
I know, this might sound odd: the loan is interest-free, but you still need to capitalize some borrowing cost on it. Careful!
Do you face any other issues with the borrowing cost? Please leave a comment below and share this article with your friends. Thanks!
JOIN OUR FREE NEWSLETTER AND GET
report "Top 7 IFRS Mistakes" + free IFRS mini-course
Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.
Recent Comments
- Silvia on 3 Biggest Myths in Accounting for PPE
- RASHEED ABOLOMOPE on 3 Biggest Myths in Accounting for PPE
- Silvia on IFRS Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economy (IAS 29)
- Navison on IFRS Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economy (IAS 29)
- Silvia on IAS 12 Income Taxes
Categories
- Accounting Policies and Estimates (14)
- Consolidation and Groups (24)
- Current Assets (21)
- Financial Instruments (56)
- Financial Statements (52)
- Foreign Currency (9)
- IFRS Videos (71)
- Insurance (3)
- Most popular (6)
- Non-current Assets (54)
- Other Topics (15)
- Provisions and Other Liabilities (45)
- Revenue Recognition (26)
- Uncategorized (1)
For Example a qualifying asset starts Trial Run Production on March 16, 2017 but final commercial Operations Date when independent Engineer gives completion certificate is May 31, 207. By What date Borrowing Cost should be capitalized i.e March 16, 2017 or May 31, 2017.
Hi silvia Good Article on Borrowing cost
I have a question. Should borrowing Cost be capitalized upto test Run Production Date or the Date of the Final Production when final commercial operations are started?
Hi Sylvia,
may I commend you for the good job you’re doing. kindly held me understand discontinued operations IFRS 5
Try here 🙂
You are a very clever individual!
Thanks in favfor of sharing such a fastidilus opinion, articke iis good, thsts why i have read it entirely
Hi Silvia
1) I need some guidance on accounting for break costs (breaking costs associated with refinancing a loan or restructuring. Which accounting standard should I look as it not captured in AASB 123?
2) If the break costs are inherent in the interest rate swap (i.e. we terminate the existing swaps and get a new one and the bank uplifts the rate). Is there any specific way to account for this ?
Thanks
i wanted to ask what are the disclosure requirements on borrowing costs in accordance with IAS 23
Hi,first id like to thank you for your kindness and effort. my question is that if we have qualified asset that starts in mid 2016 and ends at end of 2017. do we recognize the portion of capitalized interest in 2016 first or wait till the end of construction in 2017 and then capitalize the interest. regards
Mohamad, you should capitalize in 2016 if all conditions are met. S.
hi silvia,
suppose i took loan for construction of an asset on april 1st and construction started on july 1st . i earned interest from this borrowing from april to june. do we need to deduct this amount or we will charge this as an income in pnl
please, what is the treatment for borrowing cost for buildings which is for sale in theses cases:
1- if we sold all units, what we have to do with the upcoming interest expenses.
2- if partially sold and we transfer the WIP to inventory.
Hi Mohammed, if the construction ceases, then you should stop capitalizing borrowing cost. Therefore, you should expense the borrowing cost for your 2 cases. S.
How to deal with repayment of loan in capitalization of interest. Is it assumed that due to repayment of installments interest cost will get reduced?
I mean can we add the loan interest and arrangement fee to the cost of land acquired through mortgage finance
Dear Kumar,
the arrangement fee needs to be treated as a part of the effective interest method under IFRS 9 (it means that your actual interest rate would be different from what you have in your contract, because you need to count with all cash flows from the loan).
In fact, you can capitalize the borrowing cost related to the land acquisition IF you are developing this land – i.e. you can capitalize these costs only during the period when the land is being developed. But, if you buy the land with the loan and you hold it for future development – then no, you cannot capitalize the costs during the holding period. S.
Can we capitalise the interest and arrangement fee of the loan taken for buying land with an intention to build residential properties to be sold in the market
I have really learnt a lot from all these interactions… thanks everyone for sharing your experiences.
Do we capitalize the premium on redeemable debentures to the qualifying asset if for example, the construction of the asset was specifically financed by issuing debentures at an interest rate of 12% per annum redeemable at a premium of 5%
Hi Silvia, I’ve got a question: is it possible to add implied cost of carry (cost of holding cash) to the capitalised rate? For example at my work our cap. int. rate is based on Gross amounts – so we offset Borrowings by derivatives amount and calculate the rate as Gross Borrowing costs/Gross Debt, which results in say 5%. I was wondering if we could base this calculation on a net basis – we would offset Borrowings by derivatives as well as cash and calculate the rate as Net Borrowing costs/Net Debt. If I do that the rate increases by about 0.30-0.50%.
None of our borrowings are specific so we just apply the rate to the general pool. My argument for calculating the rate on a net basis would be that it costs us to hold the cash that we borrowed in advance of financing the projects. But then again the standard does say that “borrowing costs” are actual costs incurred, so I suppose this “implied rate” idea wouldn’t be allowed. Thanks, Tania
Dear Tania,
what specifically is a cost of holding cash? Unless it is some adjustment to the interest paid to a bank, then I doubt it is considered a borrowing cost at all. For me it seems that it is not a cost of obtaining financing; rather it is a “storage” cost and therefore, I doubt it meets the definition of borrowing costs under IAS 23.
Hi Silvia
I think holding cost is similar to commitment or non-utilization fee paid to the bank on the remaining loan balance and the borrow will continue to pay it until the full loan facility is used up.
This sort of loan facility is usually arranged for long term projects with uncertain cash flow forecast.
I don’t understand why such payments on specific borrowings do get capitalized to qualifying assets.
Dear Fitsum,
I’ve just noted I did not respond to one of your questions above. As for the non-utilization fee or holding cost: I think it would be hard and quite aggressive to state that these are borrowing costs, because they arose due to non-investing the cash into the acquisition of qualifying assets and not due to investing, isn’t it? It is unlikely that these costs are directly attributable to the construction of an asset as they arose due to holding cash, and not due to construction.
So no, I would not capitalize these payments. S.
Dear Silvia,
I was reading questions and responses on the non utilisation fees (i.e. commitment fees)and origination fees.
In case we have a real estate asset (payment is deferred)and also have an arrangement with the bank to get a loan at the later time (when the payment will be due) and for the non-utilisation period we are paying a commitment fee.
Shall we show an arrangement fee and a commitment fee as prepayment until the loan will be drawdown and on this event there will be a reclass from prepayment to loan.
As the real estate will be under development and loan will be at amortised cost, shall we show amortisation of arrangement and commitment fee separately from the “interest” as only the latter will be capitalised into asset?
Many thanks
Hi Silvia M.
a loan obtain for the purpose of purchase a land and construction a mall on it. first withdraw is for purchasing the land and second after the permission of building is obtained. the obtaining the building permission and designing normally takes 1 year. During this period, interest incurred, and purchased and is incurred and activities for getting the asset ready is being processed like design and government permission. therefore, in this case the land is a qualified asset as it is not ready for its intended use and the activities for getting the asset ready is being processed, the interest on purchasing the land can be capitalized?
Regards
Jameel
Great! Very grateful to you.
Hi Silvia,
Quick question.
We have a loan in a foreign currency loan which is being utilized to construct a property (which will be leased).
There was a recent devaluation in the currency and we not hav a huge unrealised forex loss.
Can we capitalize this forex loss or should i be expensed?
Hi Quam,
well, FX loss on a loan can be capitalize to the extent that this loss is regarded as an adjustment to interest costs. Please see the article above. S.
Hi Silvia
First of all thanks for such a nice article. I have a small query. See normally intercompany loans doest not specify the term for which they are given. So how to calculate fair value in this case?
That should be the best estimate, with reassessment each year. S.
Hi Silvia…How can we differntiate general borrowings from specific borrowings because in some cases its really confusing with each other….
Hi Silvia,
I have a question with regard to a loan obtained specifically to finance both the acquisition of land and construction of a building on that land. Can the interest (during the construction period) on the entire loan be capitalized? Or do I have to allocate how much is attributable to the purchase of the land and how much is attributable to the construction of the building and subsequently only capitalize the interest on the portion attributable to the construction?
Many thanks,
April
Dear Silvia, thank you for your efforts!
It’s a realy very useful site!
Just a short question.
Situation: there is some fixed assets which already installed and operated.
Expensive modernisation of that fixed asset is to be started.
Modernisation will be continued more than one year.
Fixed asset will be used during modernisation.
At your opinion, is the modernisation a qualifying assets?
Thank you in advance!
Dear Roman,
this is a very interesting question and I must say that there was a lot of discussion around capitalizing borrowing cost on renovations.
IAS 23 defines qualifying asset as an asset that takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale. However, you mentioned that your fixed asset will be in use during the modernisation and therefore, it has already been ready for its use/sale and it does NOT qualify for capitalization of borrowing costs.
However, if your asset would be put out of operation during the modernization and modernization would change its use (purpose, functionality, capacity, whatever), then these costs could be capitalized as the asset would be qualifying.
Hope this helps!
S.
Hi, in the case of real estate project which are basically into Mall and office premise construction and later on they put mall and office spaces on rent. For the purpose of construction, major cost goes towards buying land and also it takes substantial time to start construction after land purchase. My question is whether it is allowed to capitalize interest cost on acquisition of land which obviously forms part of Mall after construction. If yes, in local GAAP in India, land forms part of separate asset in the fixed asset register, whether answer will change.
Dear Manoj,
if the land forms a part of a development project and requires significant landscaping and adjustments, then I think it would be possible to justify the capitalization. S.
Hi Silvia,
Thank you for the explanations and comments which are very useful. Just a short question. A general borrowing agreement specifically prohibits spending money on capital expenditure and a bank approves a list of bills to be paid. List would consist of working capital items only. In this case can a company argue that interest on general borrowing will not be capitalised as a part of qualifying asset? Or this argument contradicts with substance over form principle?
Thank you in advance
Tatyana
Thank u Silvia.M for ur detailed description..
Dear Sylvia,
should the Company capitalize appraisal fee, and commitment fee related to EBRD loan?
Thanks!
Hi Dzenita,
these fees are origination fees, so you should adjust cash flows from your loan. In other words, you take these fees into account when deriving amortized cost (assuming you measure your loan at amortized cost). S.
can you please tell the accounting treatment of the income earned by the investment of idle funds in specific borrowing. Would it be treated in the P&L?
You cannot capitalize the foreign exchange gain/loss on the liability (loan) itself, because that’s NOT a borrowing cost. You need to realize here, that your loan is a financial liability that must be subsequently measured under IAS 39/IFRS 9.
Please clarify
Hi
Does the interest charges incurred on Hire Purchase of a vehicle constitute as borrowing cost and therefore can this be capitalized?
Dear if the seller give us to pay the pdp (pre Delivery payment) of the aircraft on the old escalation factor which is lower than the new one and the differences between the old and the new one to be paid on the delivery with their interest can i capitalize the interest
Respected Madam. My Question is that i have obtained 3 tyoes of Loan form BANK 1st @ 3% of Rs.500,000/- from 01-07-2014 to paid Rs. 200,000/- on 31-12-2015 Remaing Rs.300,000/- un paid on 30-06-2015, 2nd Typs of Loan is Rs.100,000/-@ 5% is obtained from bank 01-07-2014 and paid on 31-may-2015. and 3rd obtain from bank 01-7-2015 is Rs.400000/ @ 6% Still un paid on 30-06-2015.All these borrowing are General BOrrowing and used for both i.e qualified assets and other . waht would be the capitalized rate.
Hi Azhar
Loan amount Rate Time Interest
500,000 3% 0.50 7,500
300,000 3% 0.50 4,500
100,000 5% 0.92 4,583
400,000 6% 1.00 24,000
Total Interst Paid 40,583
Total Loan amount 800,000
Effective Interest Rate 5.07
I would like Silvia to comment on the understanding.
Hey, I am a student studying the accounting standards. Do you know any place from where i can practise questions related to IAS 23?
Hi there, quick question on arrangement fees associated with debt taken out to purchase/invest in a subsidiary – can this arrangement fee be capitalized in line with IAS 23 (I believe it can but am not sure!).
Thanks!
Dear Michelle, arrangement fees associated with debt should be treated as a part of cash flows in the application of the effective interest method. It means – no, the fee itself is cannot be capitalized as such, but you should take it into account in the amortized cost calculation. In order words, your effective interest rate needs to count with an arrangement fee and your effective interest (capitalized or not) would be adjusted by the arrangement fee, too. S.
Hi Silvia
Thanks for clarifying on the treatment of arrangement fee. As I understand from your comment, arrangement fee incurred for obtaining loans can be amortised but not capitalised to qualifying assets.
Would you please enlighten me with the treatment of non-utilisation fee on loan facilities obtained for financing qualifying assets? Should this get written off immediately or can it be capitalised to the qualifying asset?
Thanks
Fitsum
For specific borrowing do we calaculate interest based on the loan drawdowns on the asset or on the total loan amount. For instance if loan is for $1m and only $200k is the expenditure actually incurred. Is capitalised interest based on $1m or $200k for the specific loan?
Hello Carol
The interest should be capitalised proportionately in terms of the portion actually utilised to acquire the asset. Note that if part of the loan is invested the total interest should be reduced by the investment income before any capitalisation considerations.
pls can you give the pratical example pls ma that what am going through
Hi Silvia, what about costs of obtaining the borrowing? Can you capitalise it?
Hi Cynthia, usually, cost of obtaining the borrowing – like some initial fees etc. are incorporated into the effective interest method and the effective interest rate changes as a result. In other words – they are neither straightly capitalized nor expensed in P/L, but instead, the loan accounting is altered to implement the effective interest method. S.
Hi Silvia
I would appreciate if you could elaborate further with examples on other borrowing costs like processing fee for loan. How to account them.
Thanking you
Sonam Choeden
DGPC
Bhutan
I would like to know how is the borrowing cost should be present in the financial statements (the double entry of capitalization)
Hi Chirantha
The double entry is as follows:
DR Asset (The asset you are constructing)
CR Accrued Interest/Interest Payable/Cash
Dear Silvia,
Thank you for the explanation of IAS 23. I very keenly follow your articles and often refer to them when I need some clarification.
Moreover, I have a question if you don’t mind, can you explain the Question 2 in detail please as I was not quite able to follow the same.
Thanks for all the Help and contributions to our world of accounting!!!!
Regards,
Rahul C.
You are the best Sylvia. Trust me, your explanation is so much simple that I sometimes find myself asking whether it’s accounting am seeing on your website. You make it very simple and easy to use. Thanks so much.
Thanks 🙂
Standard says that, capitalize borrowing costs if they are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset
Can we capitalize the borrowing cost for the asset acquired?
please help silviya
Hi Hiras,
do you mean “for the asset acquired by purchase?” Well, I don’t think so, because an asset must be qualifying – by definition, it must take a substantial period to get ready for the intended use or sale – and if you purchase the asset, then it’s not a substantial period, is it?
ok silviya i agree with u. then why standard use the word acquisition in the borrowing cost
Hi Hiras, I think standard here means that sometime some assets takes time to assemble and if it is a substantial period of time then you can capitalize it. I would ask Silvia to comment on our understanding
This actually happens quite frequently. It could take 3 months to transport and assemble a system of equipment. Suppose the company borrow money to specifically fund the acquisition of the system. Since 3 months are commonly considered not “substantial”, does this mean we CANNOT capitalize the borrowing costs? Note that the standard states that borrowing costs MUST be capitalized if the asset is a qualifying one. But it isn’t clear if we MUST expense borrowing costs if the asset is not a qualifying one, especially in situation where the fund is used to specifically fund the acquisition of the asset.
Hi Silvia
When a company borrows money thru buyers credit in Foreign currency , the restatemennt gain / loss is not allowed to be capitlaised, but the interest that woould have beeb incurrened in fucntional currency less the interest on the actual borrowing in FC, can be capitalised as per IAS 23.
my simple question is : is the period to be considered for capitalisation of interest cost is from the date of loan till date of replayment of the loan or only till the capitalisation ?
Hi Prashanth,
the capitalisation should stop when you complete substantially all activities to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale. It means that while you still construct the asset, you capitalise incurred interest cost and when the loan is repaid, then there will be no more interest cost to capitalise. S.
Very insightful, Thanks you very much. Silvia.
its great article. i am getting some grip on standards which were my worst nightmares….. thank you once again
regards
Abdul Rehman
Great elaboration of this cost. Thank you so much!!
Hey Silvia
Thank you so much for clarifying the borrowing cost this information is very helpful as im writing my exam on specific financial reporting next week.
I work in the Accounting and Auditing Board. Recently, we have received a query from a Small & Medium Enterprise company stating that their borrowing costs are substantial for specific purpose and wanted to capitalize it. Since IFRS for SMEs doesn’t allow the borrowing costs to be capitalized, can this SME be allowed to capitalize the borrowing cost? If allowed, it will tantamount to allowing SMEs to cherry-pick some standards from full IFRS and some from IFRS for SMEs. If not allowed, charging subtantial boowing costs to P/L account will have huge implications to the firm. Any advice is appreciated.
Dear Lok,
if a company is applying IFRS for SMEs, then it should not capitalise borrowing cost as in this case, the financial statements are not fully compliant with IFRS for SMEs. It’s not really permitted to pick something from full IFRS and something from IFRS for SMEs.
However, let me say here, that maybe in this case, it would be OK for the company to apply the full IFRS. Maybe other differences between IFRS for SMEs and IFRS applicable for this particular company are not that significant and the company would be able to capitalise borrowing cost. S.
Hi Silvia, you advised in teh article” a subsidiary needs to set the fair value of the loan received using the market interest rates and book the difference between the loan’s fair value and the cash received in profit or loss.”
May I know the double entries for this adjustment both initally and in the subsequent year?
Regards
Wilson
Hi Wilson,
if you are subscribed to the IFRS Kit, this example is solved there step by step. I can’t really cover it in the comments, as there’s not enough room 🙂 S.
Please, how can we subscribe to the IFRS kit?
You can register online on this page. S.
Thank you Silvia,Could you please elaborate more on the question # 3 i.e., interest free inter company loan, how to set its fair value with example?
Hmmm, I see that this question comes up. As I have answered here already – exactly this example is covered in the IFRS Kit, but maybe I will elaborate some example in the separate article. S.
have question regarding the IAS 23
Year 01-07-2014 and ended on 30-06-2015
I have obtained loan form BANK 250,000 @ 3% ON 01-07-2014 for a six month and paid on 31-12-2014. and i have obtained other loan 400,000 at 01-01-2015 @ 4% interest for three month 31-03-2015 and paid. on 01-04-2015 i have obtained other loan 500,000 @ 7% for six month. these are general borrowing . please calculated the borrowing cost and capitalized rate.
Dear Azhar,
it seems that you had only 1 loan at a time – so the capitalization rate is simply an interest rate on that loan. You can calculate borrowing cost based on the amount you actually spent on a qualified asset. Just be careful, as the borrowing cost needs to be on actual incurred (paid) expenditures, not just accrued. S.
When we can capitalize the financial lease loan interest amount. My question is as below.
1, Starting the loan period
2, When the actual interest payment happening.
Please clear me.
Hi, you should capitalise interest when it is incurred. In fact, you also need to meet 3 conditions for capitalising interest under IAS 23. S.
Hi Sylvia,
I must commend you on your time and effort to increase IFRS knowledge around the world.
A quick one Sylvia, can you briefly differentiate cost incurred from cost accrued.
My understanding is that the term “incurred” originates from the “accrual concept” as cost is incurred “when a party becomes liable”.
I have gone through the three criteria for capitalization of borrowing cost. These criteria are as follow:
“The commencement date for capitalization is the date when the entity first meets all of the following conditions:
i. it incurs expenditures for the asset;
ii. it incurs borrowing costs; and
iii. it undertakes activities that are necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale.”
Please can you clarify this?
Dear Simon
I think all the thee criteria must not be seen as separately rather they will happen simultaneously i.e when you undertake some activities that are necessary to make the qualifying asset ready for its intended use (criterion iii), you might pay money for such activities (criterion) and if such money comes from borrowing or not from your pocket it carries interest/borrowing cost (criterion ii). We can understand in this order whether all thee criteria are met simultaneously. No accrual concept here is necessary.
what are the three condition to be met in capitalization of interest under IAS 23
Hi madam, I have small doubt. Can I please ask you.
Hi Silvia,
I work in a Bank. I would like to solve an accounting issue. We have revalued all our land and Building in 2012. Now this year, we have started the operation of a new branch. So this new branch has land area 7500sq and out of which 1158sq is building area. My question is we have debit all the costs to make this building in our work in progress account. So should i reverse this WIP account and capitalize the amount to Building directly? My understandng about IAS 16 was if revaluation model is used in one class then entire assets of that class should be taken as revaluation model.
Sorry, Asma, I don’t understand your question. You have started the operation – meaning that the new branch is in a revalued building? Or you have started a construction? Why do you have WIP? Please clarify as I’m lost in your question. S.
Silvia
Finance charges on finance leases under IAS 17; and
Now we dose not have IAS 17 There is IFRS 16
thank you very much for the mailing. I really appreciate to your note.